Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/27967/2025 of KUNDURU BALAIAH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3624] TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 27967/2025 Between: 1. KUNDURU BALAIAH, C/O. KUNDURU

APHC010541942025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

&

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 27967/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. KUNDURU BALAIAH, C/O. KUNDURU DURGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC DAILY LABOUR, R/O. 77-35-17, PAIPULA ROAD, AJITH SINGH NAGAR SHANTHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (EXCISE) DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST ZONE, VIJAYAWADA,

5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NORTH DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA.

6. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NUNNA PS, VIJAYAWADA CITY, NTR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MANNAM RAJA SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR W.P.No.27967 of 2025 JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

None appeared for the Petitioner.

2. Sri Akula Venkata Sai Jagadeesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the period of detention under impugned orders has been completed. Hence, the Writ Petition has rendered infructuous by afflux of time.

3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

4. No Order as to Costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.

_____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

_____________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J Dt: 15.09.2026 JKS

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 27967 OF 2025

15.09.2026

JKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead