Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/22746/2024 of M/s. I.R CONSTRUCTIONS. Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22746/2024 Between: 1. M/S. I.R CONSTRUCTIONS., REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER INTURI RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR, R/O. H. NO. 2 SECTOR-10, MVP COLONY,

APHC010440612024

IN THE

TUESDAY, T

THE HONOURAB

WRIT

Between:

1. M/S. I.R CONSTRUC

INTURI RAMAIAH

CONTRACTOR, R/O

SECTOR-10, MVP CO

1. THE STATE OF AN

SECRETARY,

R

SECRETARIAT, VELA

2. THE SUPERINTEND

CIRCLE OFFICE

PRADESH-534006.

3. THE DISTRICT COLL

4. THE EXECUTIVE EN

OFFICE, NARASIM

534006.

5. THE

ENGINEER

PUNAMMATHOTA, LA

6. THE STATE OF AN

SECRETARY,

F

SECRETARIAT VELA

W.P.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

T PETITION NO: 22746/2024

CTIONS., REP BY ITS MANAGING PA

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OC

. H. NO. 2-37-5/2, SAMPURNA NIVAS

OLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 017.

...PE

AND

NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P

ROADS

AND

BUILDINGS

DEPA

AGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 5

DING ENGINEER, ROADS AND B

NARASIMHARAO PET, ELURU,

ECTOR, ELURU ELURU DISTRICT.

NGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS

MHARAO PET, ELURU, ANDHRA P

IN

CHIEF,

R

AND

B

HOD

ABBIPET VIJAYAWADA - 520 010.

NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P

INANCE

AND

PLANNING

DEPA

AGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 52

RC,J

No.22746 of 2024

H

ATI

ARTNER -

CC CIVIL

MIG - 17,

TITIONER

PRINCIPAL

ARTMENT,

522 503.

UILDINGS

ANDHRA

DIVISION

PRADESH-

OFFICE,

PRINCIPAL

ARTMENT.

22 503.

RC,J

W.P.No.22746 of 2024

7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, POWERPET, ELURU,ANDHRA PRADESH-534005.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the final bill payments of Rs.6,91,77,868/- payable to the petitioner in relation to the work Widening and Strengthening of Eluru to Medisettivaripalem road from KM 0/390 to 63/680 in West Godavari District vide Cir. Agt. No. 10/2020-21 Dt. 08.07.2020 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amounts of Rs.6,91,77,868/- with interest @ 24percent per annum from the completion of agreement time till date of realization for the belated payments for the work executed by the petitioner as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21

of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amounts of Rs. 6,91,77,868/- with interest @ 24percent per annum from the completion of the agreement time till date of realization for the belated payments for the works executed by the petitioner and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to pay Rs.6,91,77,868/-forthwith payable to the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.UPENDRA RAO MANUKONDA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following:

RC,J

W.P.No.22746 of 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri T. Ramesh, learned counsel, representing Sri Upendra Rao Manukonda, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that the authorities had paid the amount claim in this writ petition and therefore, nothing survives for consideration and the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 15th September, 2026.

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead