Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22746/2024 of M/s. I.R CONSTRUCTIONS. Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 14 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22746/2024 Between: 1. M/S. I.R CONSTRUCTIONS., REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER INTURI RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR, R/O. H. NO. 2 SECTOR-10, MVP COLONY,
APHC010440612024
IN THE
TUESDAY, T
THE HONOURAB
WRIT
Between:
1. M/S. I.R CONSTRUC
INTURI RAMAIAH
CONTRACTOR, R/O
SECTOR-10, MVP CO
1. THE STATE OF AN
SECRETARY,
R
SECRETARIAT, VELA
2. THE SUPERINTEND
CIRCLE OFFICE
PRADESH-534006.
3. THE DISTRICT COLL
4. THE EXECUTIVE EN
OFFICE, NARASIM
534006.
5. THE
ENGINEER
PUNAMMATHOTA, LA
6. THE STATE OF AN
SECRETARY,
F
SECRETARIAT VELA
W.P.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
T PETITION NO: 22746/2024
CTIONS., REP BY ITS MANAGING PA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OC
. H. NO. 2-37-5/2, SAMPURNA NIVAS
OLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 017.
...PE
AND
NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P
ROADS
AND
BUILDINGS
DEPA
AGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 5
DING ENGINEER, ROADS AND B
NARASIMHARAO PET, ELURU,
ECTOR, ELURU ELURU DISTRICT.
NGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS
MHARAO PET, ELURU, ANDHRA P
IN
CHIEF,
R
AND
B
HOD
ABBIPET VIJAYAWADA - 520 010.
NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P
INANCE
AND
PLANNING
DEPA
AGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 52
RC,J
No.22746 of 2024
H
ATI
ARTNER -
CC CIVIL
MIG - 17,
TITIONER
PRINCIPAL
ARTMENT,
522 503.
UILDINGS
ANDHRA
DIVISION
PRADESH-
OFFICE,
PRINCIPAL
ARTMENT.
22 503.
RC,J
W.P.No.22746 of 2024
7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, POWERPET, ELURU,ANDHRA PRADESH-534005.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the final bill payments of Rs.6,91,77,868/- payable to the petitioner in relation to the work Widening and Strengthening of Eluru to Medisettivaripalem road from KM 0/390 to 63/680 in West Godavari District vide Cir. Agt. No. 10/2020-21 Dt. 08.07.2020 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amounts of Rs.6,91,77,868/- with interest @ 24percent per annum from the completion of agreement time till date of realization for the belated payments for the work executed by the petitioner as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21
of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amounts of Rs. 6,91,77,868/- with interest @ 24percent per annum from the completion of the agreement time till date of realization for the belated payments for the works executed by the petitioner and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to pay Rs.6,91,77,868/-forthwith payable to the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.UPENDRA RAO MANUKONDA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following:
RC,J
W.P.No.22746 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri T. Ramesh, learned counsel, representing Sri Upendra Rao Manukonda, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that the authorities had paid the amount claim in this writ petition and therefore, nothing survives for consideration and the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 15th September, 2026.
RR