Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/11174/2023 of GURRAPU SRINIVASULU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11174/2023 Between: 1. GURRAPU SRINIVASULU, S/O G.JAYA RAMUDU, AGE. 57 YEARS, OA.. CULTIVATION, R/O 7/1499,

APHC010213042023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. GURRAPU SRINIVASULU, S/O G.JAYA RAMUDU, AGE. 57 YEARS, OA.. CULTIVATION, R/O 7/1499, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF 1-IJNIC,, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR

DISTRICT

2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT

3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT

4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDAVADUGURU POLICE

STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents 2 to 4 in keeping the name of the Petitioner in the List of Rowdy Sheeters as illegal, arbitrary, against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet with Number 74/AN opened against the Petitioner and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to not to call the Petitioner to Police Station by assigning the reason that Petitioner being Rowdy Sheeter they have to keep a vigilance on him and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Sri N Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition became infructuous.

2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J

Date: 15.09.2026 SSA

Date: 15.09.2026 SSA/CJP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead