Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11174/2023 of GURRAPU SRINIVASULU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 14 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11174/2023 Between: 1. GURRAPU SRINIVASULU, S/O G.JAYA RAMUDU, AGE. 57 YEARS, OA.. CULTIVATION, R/O 7/1499,
APHC010213042023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. GURRAPU SRINIVASULU, S/O G.JAYA RAMUDU, AGE. 57 YEARS, OA.. CULTIVATION, R/O 7/1499, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF 1-IJNIC,, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT
3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDAVADUGURU POLICE
STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents 2 to 4 in keeping the name of the Petitioner in the List of Rowdy Sheeters as illegal, arbitrary, against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet with Number 74/AN opened against the Petitioner and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to not to call the Petitioner to Police Station by assigning the reason that Petitioner being Rowdy Sheeter they have to keep a vigilance on him and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Sri N Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition became infructuous.
2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 15.09.2026 SSA
Date: 15.09.2026 SSA/CJP