Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1906/2026 of Nalband Shamshuddin, Vs Dr Suyash Chavan, IPS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1906/2026 Between: 1. NALBAND SHAMSHUDDIN,, S/O ANWAR BASHA NALBAND, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/0 D.NO. 2/27-4,
APHC010257732026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1906/2026
Between:
1. NALBAND SHAMSHUDDIN,, S/O ANWAR BASHA NALBAND, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/0 D.NO. 2/27-4, NANDALUR BUS
STAND, NANDALUR, YSR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER
AND
1. DR SUYASH CHAVAN IPS, Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office Vijayawada, Passport Seva Kendra, Hotel Mid City, Opposite All India Radio, M. G. Road, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. 520 010
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent for contempt of court for disobeying and violating the orders of the Hon'ble Court dated 7.01.2026 in W.P. No. 36654 of 2025
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RACHURI LAKSHMIKAR
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. T NIRANJAN Deputy Solicitor General of India
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 07.01.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 36654 of 2025.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed, accordingly. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.09.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1906/2026
Date: 11.09.2026 rsd