Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1739/2026 of SREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS Vs PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1739/2026 Between: 1. SREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO.44/38-1-17, NEAR PANCHAMUKA ANJANEYA SWAMI TEMPLE,
APHC010217712026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1739/2026
Between:
1. SREE
BALAJI
CONSTRUCTIONS,
D.NO.44/38-1-17,
NEAR PANCHAMUKA ANJANEYA SWAMI TEMPLE,
CHEMMUMIAPET, KADAPA, REP., BY ITS MANAGING
PARTNER YELLIPALEM MADHU SUDHAN REDDY, S/O.
YELLIPALEM YELLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, RIO. D.NO.1/1728-3, PLOT NO.404, GARUDADRI
RESIDENCY,
YERRAMUKKAPALLE,
KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PEEYUSH
KUMAR
IAS,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238.
2. SHREEDHARCHARUKURI I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518002.
3. K
RAKESH
CHANDRAM,
KADAPA
MUNICIPAL
COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT-
516001.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to leased to punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful, deliberate and intentional violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court, dated 22.12.2025 in W.P.No.35539 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MANTHRI KIRAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. P VENGALA REDDY
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.35539 of 2025, dated 22.12.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 11.09.2026 LSP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1739/2026
Date: 11.09.2026 LSP