Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/445/2026 of S SAHADEVA REDDY Vs PEYUSH KUMAR on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

APHC010006862026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 445/2026 Between: 1. S SAHADEVA REDDY, S/O. S KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58

HN, J

C.C.No.445_2026

APHC010006862026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 445/2026

Between:

1. S SAHADEVA REDDY, S/O. S KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58

YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR CLASS-H, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1/436- 7/2, MARUTI NAGAR, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. PEYUSH

KUMAR,

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

FINANCE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI,

GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

3. SRI P BHAVANI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT, 516001, (PRESENTLY

WORKING AS COMMISSIONER) R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER

COURT ORDER DATED 17.07.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2026 IN CC NO- 445 OF 2026.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for violation of the orders, dated 09.10.2025 made in W.P.No.27777of 2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

HN, J

C.C.No.445_2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit me to bring the proposed respondent No.3 as respondent No.3 in the con tempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

2. M DELHI BABU

HN, J

C.C.No.445_2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.

3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.09.2026 NKA

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 445 of 2026 Date: 11.09.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead