Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3816/2025 of M/s. M3 Infra Projects India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS, on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3816/2025 Between: 1. M/S. M3 INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K MADHAVA RAO, S/O.
APHC010659962025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3816/2025
Between:
1. M/S. M3 INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., REP. BY
ITS MANAGING PARTNER K MADHAVA RAO, S/O.
NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. FLAT NO. 204, PAMULAPATI
HEIGHT, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R-2)
2. SRI KETAN GARG IAS, COMMISSIONER, GREATER
VISAKHAPATNAM
MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION,
VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (R-5)
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 13.08.2025 passed in WP No. 16943 of 2025 under Section 10
to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16943 of 2025, dated 13.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 11.09.2026 LSP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3816/2025
Date: 11.09.2026 LSP