Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/26093/2026 of KURELLA DEVI VARA MALLIKA PRASADA BABU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 26093/2026 Between: Kurella Devi Vara Mallika Prasada Babu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and

APHC010476452026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 26093/2026

Between:

Kurella Devi Vara Mallika Prasada Babu

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. N RAVI PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

Writ Petition No.26093 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.2 in not considering and disposing of the representation dated 05.08.2026 for enhancing subsistence allowance from 50% to 75%, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The Petitioner was initially appointed as Police Constable in the year 1991 and in course of time was promoted as Circle Inspector. Thereafter, the petitioner moved to Treasuries and Accounts Department and eventually posted as Deputy Director and Joint Secretary (Finance Officer) at the Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Institutions Society. While so, Respondent No.3 registered a criminal case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with regard to disproportionate assets. On those allegations, the petitioner placed under suspension vide G.O.Rt.No.147, dated 25.07.2023 and suspension is continuing till date. While so, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 05.08.2026 to the Respondent No.2 to enhance subsistence allowance from 50% to 75%. As the representation of the Petitioner is not being considered by the Respondent No.2, the present Writ Petition is filed.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the representation of the Petitioner would be examined and communicated the decision to the Petitioner.

4. Heard the respective counsel.

5. The present Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions: i) The Respondent Authorities are directed to examine and dispose of the representation of the Petitioner dated 05.08.2026 for enhancement of subsistence allowance and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

ii) There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date : 11.09.2026

mmk/eha

WP No.26093 of 2026

Dt.11-09-2026

mmk/eha

U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead