Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2891/2025 of Akhilesha Agro Farms Private Limited., Vs Sri Vijaya Kumar Yadav, on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2891/2025 Between: 1. AKHILESHA AGRO FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED.,, ARUGOLANU VILLAGE, NAWAB PALEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM,
APHC010537242025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2891/2025
Between:
1. AKHILESHA AGRO FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED.,, ARUGOLANU
VILLAGE,
NAWAB
PALEM,
TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST
GODAVARI
DISTRICT,
REP.
BY
ITS
AUTHORIZED
SIGNATORY, SRI. R.V.V. PRASAD RAJU, S/O. VISWANADHA
RAJU
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI VIJAYA KUMAR YADAV, GENERAL MANAGER, FOOD
CORPORATION OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, AMARAVATI, RAJA NARENDRA BUILDING, DOOR NO 74-14-2A, KRISHNA
NAGAR,
PATAMATA,
YENAMALAKUDURU
ROAD,
VIJAYAWADA-520007, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. SRI G SURESH KUMAR, VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING
DIRECTOR, THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE WAREHOUSING
CORPORATION, (A STATE GOVT. UNDERTAKING), DOOR
NO 55-17-3, C-13, 2ND FLOOR, C/O. STALIN CORPORATE
BUILDING, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BACK SIDE OF AUTO
NAGAR
BUS
STAND,
VIJAYAWADA-520007,
ANDHRA
PRADESH
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their willful, deliberate and intentional violation of the orders passed by this
Hon'ble Court in LA No. 1/2025 in WP.No.10181 of 2025 dated 11.09.2025
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. Dr MAJJI SURI BABU
2. A V G MADHAVA RAO
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders in IA No. 1 of 2025 in WP.No.10181 of 2025 dated 11.09.2025 passed by this Court.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Dr. Majji Suri Babu, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the writ petition was disposed of on 15.06.2026. He further adds that if the petitioner is aggrieved, they must file a contempt petition against the final order passed in writ petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has requested to close the contempt case with the liberty to avail appropriate remedies.
The request is acceded to. In view of the same, the contempt case is closed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue available legal remedies. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.09.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2891/2025
Date: 11.09.2026 rsd