Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16787/2006 of G.Krishna Murthy Vs The Regional Joint Director of School Education on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16787/2006 Between: 1. G.KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O.VENUGOPALAN HEAD MASTER GANDHI CENTENARY HIGH SCHOOL KAKINADA,
APHC010422702006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 16787/2006
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G.KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O.VENUGOPALAN HEAD MASTER GANDHI CENTENARY HIGH SCHOOL KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2. G.RAMA KRISHNA SASTRT, S/O.SURYANARAYANA HINDI PANDIT GANDHI CENTENARY HIGH SCHOOL KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER EAST GODAVARI, AT KAKINADA
3. THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT GANDHI CENTENARY, SCHOOL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in directing not to attend the duties as 3 months notice period was over even during the pendency of the representation/appeal before the respondents 1 and 2 as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioners in service and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 21032 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioners in service as Head master and Hindi Pandit pending the disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S GIRIMOJI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
2. VL N G K MURTHY
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri S.Girimoji Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioners, submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.09.2026
PSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No: 16787/2006
Date: 11.09.2026
W PSK