Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2926/2025 of Vattem Srinivasa Rao Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS, on 10 September 2026
APHC010539442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2926/2025 Between: 1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT
HN, J
C.C.No.2926_2025
APHC010539442025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2926/2025
Between:
1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47
YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. 36-85, PURUSHOTHAMA
PATNAM, CHILAKALURIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
(R-2)
2. SRI P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R-
3. SRI P SRIHARI BABU, COMMISSIONER, CHILAKALURIPET
MUNICIPALITY CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. (R-4)
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 12-08- 2025 passed in WP.No. 15700 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the contempt of Courts act and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
2. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI
HN, J
C.C.No.2926_2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.09.2026 NKA
HN, J
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2926 of 2025 Date: 11.09.2026
NKA