Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/187/2026 of M/S TPR INSTRUCTURES Vs SRI PEYUSH KUMAR on 10 September 2026
APHC010006792026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187/2026 Between: 1. M/S TPR INSTRUCTURES, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT D.NO.
HN, J
C.C.No.187_2026
APHC010006792026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187/2026
Between:
1. M/S TPR INSTRUCTURES, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT D.NO. 40/27-23- 2-1, MUTHARASUPALLI, KADAPA, Y.S.R
DISTRICT.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, M.NIRANJAN
REDDY, S/O. M. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33
YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 1/51, SALABAD
VILLAGE, VONTIMITTA MANDAL, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
3. SRI P BHAVANI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER,KADAPA MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.SR DISTRICT, 516001, (PRESENTLY
WORKING AS COMMISSIONER) R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER
COURT ORDER DATED 17.07.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2026 IN CC NO- 187 OF 2026.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the Respondents herein for violation of the orders, dated 03.09.2025 made in W.P.No.23429 of 2025 and pass
HN, J
C.C.No.187_2026
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit to bring the proposed respondent No.3 as respondent No.3 in the con tempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. M DELHI BABU
The Court made the following
HN, J
C.C.No.187_2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.09.2026 NKA
HN, J
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187 of 2026 Date: 11.09.2026
NKA