Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/2729/2018 of Sanganaboyina Chandra Sekhar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2729/2018 Between: 1. SANGANABOYINA CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O.SINGARAPPA, AGED 44 YRS,

APHC010727142018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2729/2018

Between:

1. SANGANABOYINA CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O.SINGARAPPA, AGED

44 YRS, R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM

MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD.

2. SIDDAREDDYGARI RAMA SUBBA REDDY, S/O.PAKKEERA REDDY, AGED 55 YRS., R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM

MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

3. SIDDAREDDYGARI CHINNA ANKI REDDY, S/O.PAKKEERA REDDY, AGED 45 YRS, R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM

MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

4. RENDEDDULA HARINARAYANA REDDY, S/O.PULLANNA, AGED 34

YRS, R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

5. GADDAM

SRINIVASULU,

S/O.PULLANNA

AGED

YRS,

R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR

KADAPA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision

GTK, J

Crl.R.C.No.2729 of 2018

Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision Case by setting aside the order dated 17-08-2018 in S.C.No.240 of 2017 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in S.C.No.240 of 2017, on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR

2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following:

GTK, J

Crl.R.C.No.2729 of 2018

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard, Mr.V.Ravi Kanth, learned counsel representing Mr.Venkat Reddy Kodumury, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, and Ms.Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

2. On 31.07.2026, a letter was addressed to the Registry by Mr.Venkat Reddy Kodumury, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, requesting that the Criminal Revision Case be posted under the caption ‘For Withdrawal’ on the ground that both the parties entered into compromise.

3. Owing to the said submission and the letter dated 31.07.2026 addressed to the Registry, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 11-09-2026 BMS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead