Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2329/2026 of VALLEPU VENKAYAMMA Vs C M SAI KANTH VARMA on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2329 OF 2026 Between: 1. VALLEPU VENKAYAMMA, W/o Late Venkateshwara Rao aged about 63 years, R/o Srinivasa Thota, Near
APHC010320302026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2329 OF 2026
Between:
1. VALLEPU VENKAYAMMA, W/o Late Venkateshwara Rao aged about 63 years, R/o Srinivasa Thota, Near Ramanamma Kshetram, Guntur.
...Petitioner
AND
1. C M SAI KANTH VARMA, District Collector, Guntur District at Guntur.
2. B Srinivasa Rao, Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur Division, Guntur District.
3. Kiran Kumar, Tahsildar, Guntur Rural Mandal Guntur District.
...Respondents
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and wantonly violating the Order dated 12.12.2025 made in W.P.No.34639 of 2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner: V V N NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SUSHMA YAGANTI
The Court made the following order:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Contempt Case is filed for non-implementation of the order passed by this Court on 12.12.2025 in W.P.No.34639 of 2025 wherein this Court has directed the respondents ‘more specifically, respondents 2 to 4, to consider the representation made by the petitioner, dated 04.08.2025 and to pass appropriate orders based on the record and a field verification’. After notice, learned counsel appearing for the contemnors has placed the proceedings of the Tahsildar i.e. respondent/contemnor no.3 dated 31.8.2026. A perusal of the said proceedings shows that the contemnors have considered the representation of the petitioner dated 04.8.2025 and passed orders which shows that there is no willful disobedience on the part of the contemnors and hence no contempt case is made out. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
11.9.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO.2329 OF 2026 11.9.2026 RD