Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/958/2026 of SURE RAMAKRISHNA SAI KUMAR Vs KRITIKA SHUKLA on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 958/2026 Between: 1. SURE RAMAKRISHNA SAI KUMAR, S/O. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, (LEASE OWNER OF SRI
APHC010062622026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 958/2026
Between:
1. SURE RAMAKRISHNA SAI KUMAR, S/O. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, (LEASE OWNER OF SRI NIDHI RICE
AND
INDUSTRIES
RICE
MILL)
R/O.
GONUGUNTALIVARIPALEM,
H/O.
PEDAKANCHERLA
VILLAGE, VINUKONDA MANDAL, NOW PALNADU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. KRITIKA SHUKLA, The Joint Collector, Palnadu, Palnadu District.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.NO.
14282 OF 2024, dated 21-03-2025 passed by Hon'ble Single Judge and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. YANAGUNURU SHASHANK
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 21.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 14282 of 2024.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed, accordingly. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.09.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 958/2026
Date: 11.09.2026 rsd