Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/8263/2026 of K M SHAKEEL SAFI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8263/2026 Between: K M Shakeel Safi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and

APHC010147262026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 8263/2026

Between:

K M Shakeel Safi and Others

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

The State Of Ap and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. V HIMABINDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

2. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following order:

Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not undertaking appointment of three members coram in A.P.Waqf Tribunal as per Section 83(4) of the Waqf Act, 2025, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare Department. On 10.08.2026, there was no representation for the petitioners, today also there is no representation for the petitioners.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare Department place on record G.O.Rt.No.107 dated 25.08.2026 and brought to the notice of this court that two members are already appointed and earlier already one appointment was made, as such nothing remains for adjudication and prayed to close the writ petition.

4. A perusal of the G.O.Rt.No.107 dated 25.08.2026 would show that two members are appointed as members of A.P.Waqf Tribunal and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare Department has stated that earlier already one appointment was made, as such there remains nothing for adjudication and the writ petition is liable to be closed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

BRS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead