Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23823/2026 of INDELA CHINNA LINGA REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NOs: 24039, 23681, 23688 and 23823 OF 2026 Between in W.P.No.24039 of 2026: ENDELA
APHC010433512026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NOs: 24039, 23681, 23688 and 23823 OF 2026
Between in W.P.No.24039 of 2026:
ENDELA RAMI REDDY, S/O. ENDELA BIDELA YALLAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURE, R/O H.
NO. 25/986 VASANTHAPETA PRODDATUR, KADAPA, YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 516360.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FOREST
DEPARTMENT,
DISTRICT. 516001
3. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, PRODDUTUR, YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT. 516001
CHINNA ANKANNA GARI MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, S/O. CHINNA
ANKANNA GARI VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCCUPATION
AGRICULTURE,
R/O.
H.
NO.
RAMAESWARAM
VILLAGE,
PRODDATUR
MAANDAL,
YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 516360.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FOREST
DEPARTMENT,
DISTRICT. 516001
DISTRICT. 516001
ALLADUPALLE MOHABOOB SANDHANI, S/O. ALLADUPALLE
MOHABOOB SHARIF AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCPATION
AGRICULTURE,
R/O
H.
NO.
20/486-P-3,
RAMAESWARAM
VILLAGE, PRODDATUR MAANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 516360.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FOREST
DEPARTMENT,
DISTRICT. 516001
3. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, PRODDUTUR, YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT. 516001
INDELA CHINNA LINGA REDDY, S/O. INDELA YALLAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURE,R/O H.
NO. 3-8, BUKKAPATNAM, KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 516360.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FOREST
DEPARTMENT,
DISTRICT. 516001
DISTRICT. 516001
Page 1 of 4
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the questioning the Notice, bearing Lr.No.R.C.No.34/2017/Pdtr, Dt.10.10.2025, issued by the 3rd respondent and trying to evict me, as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and unjust, besides being in violation of Principals of Natural Justice and also in violation of the rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
P VENKAIAH NAIDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER :
1. When these matters are taken up for hearing, Ms.Kudupudi Siva Jyothi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests, brought to the notice of this Court that the subject matter is already covered by the order of the Division Bench, dated 29.10.2025 passed in WP(PIL) NO.89 of 2024.
2. For ready reference, the order is extracted infra:
“A copy of the affidavit, dated 08.07.2025, has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner in the open Court.
2. According to the status report, a survey was conducted which reflected that there are as many as 219 encroachers in Sy.No.558, encroachers in Sy.No.542/4 and
Page 2 of 4
encroachers in Sy.No.218/1 in Rameswaram Reserve Forest. Notices to as many as 172 encroachers are stated to have been served out of 219 in Sy. No.558 and 200 encroachers out of 266 in Sy.No.542/4 and 50 encroachers out of 245 in Sy No.218/1.
3. Therefore, there are a large number of encroachers who are yet to be served.
4. We direct the forest authorities to take appropriate steps for service of notices on the unserved encroachers. Steps be also taken to take the matter forward in accordance with the relevant Rules after giving an adequate opportunity of being heard to the concerned noticees.
5. We would appreciate if the Forest Department on the next date of hearing gives details of its success rate in evicting those who are found to have encroached the reserve forest area. Although an argument has been made that the encroachments have been in existence for some time in the past, yet, in our opinion, it may be open to the Government to rehabilitate them at alternate sites but they cannot be permitted to remain any longer in the reserve forest area.
Page 3 of 4
6. Be that as it may, the action taken report be submitted on or before the next date of hearing as ordered.
7. List on 26.11.2025."
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests would further submit that the petitioners’ names and Survey Numbers are also there in the list.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that the petitioners have already submitted their explanation and the present writ petitions may be disposed of in the same lines as ordered by the Division Bench.
5. Having regard to the above submissions, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, directing the Forest Authorities concerned to take appropriate decision according to the Governing Rules and Law after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the petitioners. Till such time, the petitioners shall not be vacated forcibly. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.09.2026 Krs
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.Nos.24039, 23681, 23688 and 23823 of 2026
( COMMON ORDER )
DATE: 10.09.2026
Krs
Page 4 of 4
Loading citations and judicial treatment…