Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/30816/2023 of B VIJAYA SEKHAR REDDY Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30816/2023 Between: B Vijaya Sekhar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh

APHC010592452023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 30816/2023

Between:

B Vijaya Sekhar Reddy

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:

Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 07.08.2023 and not protecting the government land in an extent of Ac.4.48 cents in Sy.No.71 situated at Pidathalagudipadu village, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard Sri Kale Vijaya Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Venkata Satya Narayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue upon the instructions of the Tahsildar, Santhanuthalapadu dated 03.07.2026 submitted that the revenue officials have erected flexi in the subject land and instructed that no one should enter into the said land and the police authorities have registered a case against the encroachers vide Crime No.121/2023 on 01.09.2023 which is pending consideration and that they would take steps in accordance with law and accordingly prayed to close the writ petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed to close the writ petition by recording the said submission.

5. A perusal of the instructions dated 03.07.2026 would indicate that the revenue officials have erected flexi in the subject land and instructed that no one should enter into the said land and the police authorities have registered a case against the encroachers vide Crime No.121/2023 on 01.09.2023 which is pending consideration and as the authorities have stated that they would take steps in accordance with law, there remains nothing for adjudication and the writ petition is liable to be closed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

BRS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead