Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1902/2023 of CHERUKUMUDI GURU STRINIVAS Vs D.HARITHA on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1902/2023 Between: 1. CHERUKUMUDI GURU STRINIVAS, S/O. LATE C. ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC
APHC010143422023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1902/2023
Between:
1. CHERUKUMUDI GURU STRINIVAS, S/O. LATE C. ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 2/223, SAIBABA STREET, NARASINGA RAO PET, GUDURU, TIRUPATHI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. D HARITHA, , D/o. not known, Commissioner, Nellore Municipal Corporation, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for intentionally and deliberately Violated the orders of Hon'ble court passed in W.P.No. 32143 of 2018 dated 22.03.2022 as per the provisions of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the proposed respondent No.2 as the respondent to the main contempt petition as he is proper and necessary party respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAMALAKARA RAO BATHINA
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. A S C BOSE
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.1902 of 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri B. Kamalakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, appeared through virtual mode and stated that the respondent is intending to implement the orders of this Court and requested to close the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 10.09.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.1902 of 2023
10.09.2026 KBN