Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/21140/2026 of Bathula Mariyamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21140 OF 2026 Between: 1. BATHULA MARIYAMMA, W/O NAGARAJU, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC, COOLIE, JOURNALIST COLONY, ONGOLE

APHC010391432026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 21140 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. BATHULA MARIYAMMA, W/O NAGARAJU, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC, COOLIE, JOURNALIST COLONY, ONGOLE TOWN, PLOT NO 139/1A, ONGOLE MUNICIPALITY, PIN 523001. PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPORTMENT,

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PIN.522238

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ONGOLE, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, PIN 523001K

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ONGOLE ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. PIN 523001

4. THE TAHASILDAR ONGOLE, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. PIN 523001

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. VANKAYALAPATI N PRAVEEN SC For GNT,ONG,NLR Municipal Corporations

2. GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following order:

Being aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 without following due process of law highhandedly interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the house site to an extent of Ac.0.1¼ cents in Plot No.193/1A, Sy.No.362, Koppolu Village, the present writ petition is filed.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3 submits that the petitioner had encroached over the Government property on the right portion in an unauthorized manner and that the respondent authorities have demolished the said encroachment. Photographs showing the alleged encroachment have been placed on record.

3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, making it clear that the respondent authorities shall follow due process of law, if the respondents intend to take any further action in respect of the lawful property of the petitioner, over which the petitioner has constructed a residential house.

4. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated: 10.09.2026 BSK

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 21140 OF 2026

Dated: 10.09.2026 BSK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead