Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33801/2025 of SAMUDRALA SAMRAJYAM Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 September 2026
& AGD, J W.P.No.33801 of 2025) APHC010655282025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 33801 OF
APHC010655282025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 33801 OF 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SAMUDRALA SAMRAJYAM, W/o. late Naga Malleswara Rao, Aged 49 years R/o. 5-15-21 Pailekondavan Street Ithanagar Tenali Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Chief Secretary General Administration (SC.I) Department,, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati.
2. The District Collector AND District Magistrate, Guntur district at Guntur
3. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur district at Guntur
4. The Deputy Director of Prosecutions, (Administration DDO) (Guntur Guntur and Bapatla District) Guntur Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus questioning the confirmation order passed by the respondent vide G.O. RT 1311 General Administration (SC-I)
Department approval order vide G.O.RT 1090 Generaldated 10.07.2025 and Administration (SC-I) Department dated 03.06.2025 as well as the order of detention vide Rc.No.REVGNT-CSECOPDL(PRC)/6/2025-SA(C1)-COLGNT dated 26-05-2025 issued by the 2ND respondent in respect of Samudrala Pavan Kumar @ Laddu @ Laddu Bhai S/o Krupavaram @ Nagamalleswara Rao aged 33 years R/o. Near Ambedkar Statute Centre Ithanagar, Tenali Town, Guntur District as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the detenu forthwith duly setting aside the proceedings of confirmation order passed by the 1 ST respondent vide G.O. RT 1311 General Administration (SC-I) Department dated 10.07.2025, and approval order vide G.O. RT 1090 General Administration (SC-I) Department dated 03.06.2025 as well as the
order of detention vide Rc.No. REVGNT- CSECOPDL(PRC)/6/2025-SA(C1 )-COLGNT dated 26-05-2025 issued by the 2ND respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release the petitioner’s son Samudrala Pavan Kumar @ Laddu @ Laddu Bhai S/o Krupavaram @ Nagamalleswara Rao aged 33 years, R/o. Near Ambedkar Statute Centre Ithanagar Tenali Town Guptur, District forthwith duly suspending the confirmation of order of detention passed by the 1ST respondent vide G.O. RT 1311 General Administration (SC-I) Department St dated 10.07.2025 and approval order vide G.O. RT 1090 General Administration (SC-I) Department dated 03.06.2025, as well as the order of detention vide Rc.No. REVGNT- CSECOPDL(PRC)/6/2025-SA(C1)-COLGNT dated 26-05-2025 issued by the 2ND respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order:
ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
Smt. Marella Radha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statutory maximum period of detention of one (01) year has been completed and the detenu has already been released. Therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
____________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J
Date: 10.09.2026 RPD/KSK.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
(Dismissed as Infructuous)
WRIT PETITION NO: 33801 of 2025
Date: 10.09.2026
RPD/KSK.