Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/33801/2025 of SAMUDRALA SAMRAJYAM Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

& AGD, J W.P.No.33801 of 2025) APHC010655282025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 33801 OF

APHC010655282025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 33801 OF 2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SAMUDRALA SAMRAJYAM, W/o. late Naga Malleswara Rao, Aged 49 years R/o. 5-15-21 Pailekondavan Street Ithanagar Tenali Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Chief Secretary General Administration (SC.I) Department,, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati.

2. The District Collector AND District Magistrate, Guntur district at Guntur

3. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur district at Guntur

4. The Deputy Director of Prosecutions, (Administration DDO) (Guntur Guntur and Bapatla District) Guntur Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus questioning the confirmation order passed by the respondent vide G.O. RT 1311 General Administration (SC-I)

Department approval order vide G.O.RT 1090 Generaldated 10.07.2025 and Administration (SC-I) Department dated 03.06.2025 as well as the order of detention vide Rc.No.REVGNT-CSECOPDL(PRC)/6/2025-SA(C1)-COLGNT dated 26-05-2025 issued by the 2ND respondent in respect of Samudrala Pavan Kumar @ Laddu @ Laddu Bhai S/o Krupavaram @ Nagamalleswara Rao aged 33 years R/o. Near Ambedkar Statute Centre Ithanagar, Tenali Town, Guntur District as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the detenu forthwith duly setting aside the proceedings of confirmation order passed by the 1 ST respondent vide G.O. RT 1311 General Administration (SC-I) Department dated 10.07.2025, and approval order vide G.O. RT 1090 General Administration (SC-I) Department dated 03.06.2025 as well as the

order of detention vide Rc.No. REVGNT- CSECOPDL(PRC)/6/2025-SA(C1 )-COLGNT dated 26-05-2025 issued by the 2ND respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release the petitioner’s son Samudrala Pavan Kumar @ Laddu @ Laddu Bhai S/o Krupavaram @ Nagamalleswara Rao aged 33 years, R/o. Near Ambedkar Statute Centre Ithanagar Tenali Town Guptur, District forthwith duly suspending the confirmation of order of detention passed by the 1ST respondent vide G.O. RT 1311 General Administration (SC-I) Department St dated 10.07.2025 and approval order vide G.O. RT 1090 General Administration (SC-I) Department dated 03.06.2025, as well as the order of detention vide Rc.No. REVGNT- CSECOPDL(PRC)/6/2025-SA(C1)-COLGNT dated 26-05-2025 issued by the 2ND respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order:

ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

Smt. Marella Radha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statutory maximum period of detention of one (01) year has been completed and the detenu has already been released. Therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

2. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.

____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

____________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J

Date: 10.09.2026 RPD/KSK.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

(Dismissed as Infructuous)

WRIT PETITION NO: 33801 of 2025

Date: 10.09.2026

RPD/KSK.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead