Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25928/2026 of B JAGANNADHAM Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 25928/2026 Between: 1. B JAGANNADHAM, S/O. LATE LINGARMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WORKING AS HEAD CONSTABLE, G.
APHC010476482026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25928/2026
Between:
1. B JAGANNADHAM, S/O. LATE LINGARMA, AGED ABOUT 56
YEARS, WORKING AS HEAD CONSTABLE, G. NO. 1492, NATIVE OF CHINNATEKUR VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL, NOW RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 505, SAI DWARAKA ENCLAVES, BALAJI NAGAR, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT 522 238.
2. THE
DIRECTOR
GENERAL
OF
POLICE,
POLICE
HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522
503.
3. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE
DISCIPLINARY
AUTHORITY, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 518 501.
4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL
DISTRICT 518 501
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court
may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the Memo issued by the 3rd Respondent in C.No.A6/07-OEPR/2022, dated 07.07.2026, calling upon the petitioner to submit a further/fmal representation on the findings of the Inquiry Officer and proposing further action in the disciplinary proceedings arising out of the Charge Memo dated 11.10.2023, while S.C.Spl.No.188 of 2022 is pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under the SCs and STs POA ActcumVI
Additional Sessions Judge, Kumool, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to Police Standing Order 150 and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the said Memo and direct Respondents No.3 and 4 not to finalise or pass any consequential order in the disciplinary proceedings until disposal of S.C.Spl.No.188 of 2022 or for such reasonable period as this Honble Court may deem fit, IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the Memo issued by the 3rd Respondent in C.No.A6/07- OEPR/2022, dated 07.07.2026, and consequently direct Respondents No.3 and 4 not to pass any final or consequential order in the disciplinary proceedings pursuant to the Charge Memo dated 11.10.2023, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass s Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y RATNA PRABHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.25928 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 10.09.2026 chs
WRIT PETITION No.25928 of 2026 Dated: 10.09.2026
chs