WP/19129/2025 of P. Vijaya Nirmala, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 9 September 2026

1. P. Vijaya Nirmala,, W/o. K. Pandurangan, aged about 32 years R/o. D. No.1-198, Narasimhapuram @ Ayyyavarikandriga Village, Palasamudram Mandal, Chittoor District, A.P. ...Petitioner AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Chief Secretary, General Administration (SC.I) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

3. The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor.

4. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Police Headquarters, Mangalagiri Guntur District, A.P.

5. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, YSR Nagar, Prashanth Nagar, Chittoor, Chittoor District, A.P. ...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondent authorities to produce the Detenue i.e., K. Pandurangan, S/o. Chinnapaya Reddy, aged 35 years i.e., the Petitioners husband who is now detained in the Central Prison, Kadapa, Y.S.R. Kadapa District before this Honble High Court and release him by declaring the impugned Detention Order vide No. REV-CSEC0PDL(PRC)/5/2025-MAGL4 dated 19.06.2025 issued by the Respondent No. 3 and the confirmation order vide G.O.Rt.No. 1227 dated 25.06.2025 issued by the Respondent No. 1 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and in contrary to the judgments of the Honble Supreme Court of India and High Courts and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to pass an interim order by suspending the impugned Detention Order vide No. REV-CSEC0PDL(PRC)/5/2025-MAGL4 dated 19.06.2025 issued by the Respondent No. 3 and the confirmation order vide G.O.Rt.No. 1227 dated 25.06.2025 issued by the Respondent No. 1, until disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order:

ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks adjournment to obtain instructions from the petitioner.

2. Sri Akula Venkata Sai Jagadeesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, submits that the statutory maximum period of detention of one (01) year has already come to an end. Consequently, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

3. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.

____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

____________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J

Date: 10.09.2026 RPD/KSK.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

(Dismissed as Infructuous)

WRIT PETITION NO: 19129 of 2025

Date: 10.09.2026

RPD/KSK.