Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16465/2026 of Motupalli Narasimha Raju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 16465/2026 Between: 1. MOTUPALLI NARASIMHA RAJU, S/O NEELAKANTESWARA RAO, AGE 53YRS, OCCU- ASSISTANT SUB
APHC010312162026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 16465/2026
Between:
1. MOTUPALLI NARASIMHA RAJU, S/O NEELAKANTESWARA
RAO, AGE 53YRS, OCCU- ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF
POLICE, GAJUWAKA TRAFFIC POLICE STATION, (NOW UNDER
SUSPENSION),
RIP
PLOT
339,
RH
COLONY,
NEW
DIBBAPALEM, PEDAGANTYADA, VISAKHAPTNAM-530044
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH-522503.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, ANDHRA PRADESH-530002.
3. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
ADMIN, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, ANDHRA PRADESH-530002.
4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SOUTH SUB- DIVISION, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY-530026.
5. ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER
OF
POLICE,
(CRIMES-
DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY OFFICER), VISAKHAPATNAM
CITY-530002.
6. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GAJUWAKA LAW AND ORDER
POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY-530026.
7. SRI C H UMA KANTH INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY
VR,(PRESENTING OFFICER IN DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY
APPOINTED
BY
THE
COMMISSIONER
OF
POLICE,
VISAKHAPATNAM CITY) VISAKHAPATNAM CITY- 530002.
8. PEDDINTI SANYASI NAIDU, , S/O GOVINDA, AGED ABOUT
32YRS, CASTE BY K VELAMA, RIO DR.NO 16-38-45/1, L V
NAGAR -14, OLD GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM, OCCU P.C
POLICE
CONSTABLE
WORKING
AT
GAJUWAKA
TRAFFIC POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY- 530026.
9. DODDI SEKHAR, S/O CHINNA RAO, AGED 31 YRS, CASTE BY
PADMASALI , OCCU PC-1443 POLICE CONSTABLE, CHINTAPALLI POLICE STATION, ASR DISTRICT, A.P., RIO
DR.NO
1-9-4ANJAYYA
COLONY,GANDHINAGAR,
ANAKAPALLI-531001.
10. SRIDARAPU TRINADH, S/O SAMBASIVARAO, AGED 53YRS, CASTE BY T KAPU, OCCU HOME GUARD -379, DUVVADA
TRAFFIC
POLICE
STATION,
KURMANNAPALEM,
VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, RIO WARD-1, KALASI COLONY, NARSIPATNAM ,ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT-531116.
11. EGALA RAVI, S/O PYDI RAJU, AGED 52YRS, CASTE BY
YADAV, OCCU GUARD- 406, WORKING AT CIVIL SUPPLY
OFFICE
GAJUWAKA,
A.P.,
RIO
DR.NO-61-2-
14/V,
RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, MALKAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM
CITY-530011.
12. KARAKA SRINU, S/O RAMANA MURTHY, OCCU PC 3122
POLICE
CONSTABLE,
WORKING
PRESENTLY
AT
GAJUWAKAL AND O PS, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, RIO
DR.NO.8- 197, SC AND BC COLONY, POLICE STATION BACK
SIDE, AGENCY LAXMIPURAM VILLAGE , GOLUGONDA
MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT-531084.
13. PACHILA NANAJI, S/O ESWARA RAO, OCCU PC 3072 POLICE
CONSTABLE,
IV
TOWN
TRAFFIC
POLICE
STATION,VISAKHAPATNAM
CITY,
R/O
UR.NO.18-90-5/1,
VISAKHA
CENTRAL
CHOUTRI,
MAHARANIPETA,
VISAKHAPATNAM CITY-530002. HOME
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings initiated by the respondents through the Charge Memo dated 06.02.2026, proposing departmental enquiry against the petitioner as it is biased charge memo and also arbitrary, illegal, mala fide, biased, violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside/quash the said Charge Memo dated 06.02.2026 and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Charge Memo dated 06.02.2026, including the departmental enquiry initiated against the petitioner, as the witnesses in the criminal case and in the departmental enquiry are same and consequently restrain the respondents from proceeding further with the enquiry in any manner whatsoever as it is a biased charge memo, in the interest of justice and pending final adjudication of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.16465 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a request to grant liberty to the Writ Petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file Writ Petition afresh.
4. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 10.09.2026 chs
WRIT PETITION No.16465 of 2026 Dated: 10.09.2026
chs