Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25353/2026 of R VEENILA KUMARI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 25353/2026 Between: 1. R VEENILA KUMARI, W/O B SURYANARAYANA AGE 41 YEARS, OCC SUB STAFF IN THE DCCB LTD,
APHC010458902026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25353/2026
Between:
1. R VEENILA KUMARI, W/O B SURYANARAYANA AGE 41 YEARS, OCC SUB STAFF IN THE DCCB LTD, VIZIANAGARAM FLAT NO
40, APHB COLONY, BODASINGAPETA, GAJAPATIVAGE, VIZIANAGARAM 535270
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT,
AGRICULTURE
AND
COOPERATIVE
DEPARTMENT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR
OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, REP BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER VIZIANAGARAM 535002
4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, REP BY ITS
CHAIRMAN
PERSON
IN
CHARGE
COMMITTEE,
VIZIANAGARAM 535002
5. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, REP BY ITS
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
CHALLAPETA
BRANCH,
MENTADA MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing punishment order dated 06 05 2026 against the petitioner without jurisdiction under Regulations and AP C S Act 1964 as illegal arbitrary highhanded and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the order dated 06 05 2026 against the petitioner as per service regulation and AP C S Act 1964 and Rules IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4th respondent to consider petitioner representation letter dated 07-07-2026, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Stay the order dated 06-05-2026, pending disposal of the write petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH S V SURAJ
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.25353 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent-Authorities in issuing the impugned penalty vide order, dated 06.05.2026 against the Petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The Petitioner was imposed a penalty of bringing down to a lower stage in the scale of pay up to the minimum of the scale, with immediate effect from 06.05.2026. Aggrieved by the same, the Writ Petition came to be filed.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services submitted that, as per the Human Resource (H.R.) Policy, an appeal is provided and Respondent No.4 is the appellate authority, and the Petitioner had to pursue the remedy of appeal rather than filing the present Writ Petition straightaway.
4. Heard the counsels.
5. Considering the submissions, as there is an alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition, and this Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the Petitioner to pursue the remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority.
6. No order as to costs.
7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 10.09.2026 chs
WRIT PETITION No.25353 of 2026 Dated:10.09.2026
chs