Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/4258/2024 of MANYAM SIDDA REDDY Vs D PRABHAKAR REDDY (not pressed) on 8 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4258/2024 Between: 1. MANYAM SIDDA REDDY, S/O. SIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO. 1/144, PUTTAYAPALLI VILLAGE,CHINTHALACHERUVU, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR
APHC010484892024
IN THE
WEDNESDAY
THE HONOURAB
CONT
Between:
1. MANYAM SIDDA RE
YEARS, OCC AGRIC
VILLAGE,CHINTHALA
DISTRICT.
2. BEERAM SIVARAMI
ABOUT 48 YEARS,
PUTTAYAPALLI
V
MANDAL, YSR KADA
3. BEERAM VENKATA
AGED ABOUT 55 YE
PUTTAYAPALLI
V
MANDAL, YSR KADA
4. MUDAMALA JAYARA
ABOUT 58 YEARS
PUTTAYAPALLI VIL
DISTRICT
1. D
PRABHAKAR R
DIVISIONAL LEVEL D
DISTRICT
C.C.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
TEMPT CASE NO: 4258/2024
EDDY, S/O. SIDDA REDDY, AGED A
CULTURE, R/O D.NO. 1/144, PUTTA
ACHERUVU, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR
REDDY,, BEERAM SIVARAMI REDDY
OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO
VILLAGE,CHINTHALACHERUVU,
APA DISTRICT S/O. B NARASIMHA RE
SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. B NARAYANA
EARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.N
VILLAGE,CHINTHALACHERUVU,
APA DISTRICT
AMI REDDY, , S/O. M POLI REDDY
, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.N
LLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR
...PETIT
AND
REDDY
NOT
PRESSED,
(PREVIOU
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ADHONI K
RC,J
No.4258 of 2024
H
ATI
ABOUT 50
AYAPALLI
R KADAPA
Y, AGED
. 1-160-2,
BADVEL
DDY,
A REDDY,
NO. 1-146,
BADVEL
Y, AGED
NO. 1-14,
KADAPA
TIONER(S)
US
DPO)
KURNOOL
RC,J
C.C.No.4258 of 2024
2. SRI G RAJALAKSHMI PRESENT DPO NOT PRESSED, THE
DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA RR1 AND 2 ARE NOT PRESSED FROM THIS CONTEMPT
CASE AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 18.11.2024 IN CC.NO.4258
OF 2024.
3. SRI
PERUMALLAGARI
VERNA
REDDYPREVIOUS
PS,
T.SANDRAPALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATI GOPAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
4. SRI B TIMMAIAH PRESENT PS, THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PUTTAYAPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT ST.
5. SRI A VENKATA RAMAIAH EXONERTED, THE EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, MINOR
IRRIGATION WORKS DIVISION,KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
R5 IS EXONERATED FROM THIS CONTEMPT CASE AS PER
COURT ORDER DATED 24 04 2025 IN CC NO 4258 OF 2024
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein for willfully and deliberately violating the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.22190 of 2023, dated.05.09.2023 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may pleased to dispense with filing of the Certified Copy of the order passed in CC No. 4258 of 2024 dated 24.04.2025 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extending the time granted in order dated.24.4.2025 in C.C.No.4258/2024
RC,J
C.C.No.4258 of 2024
for paying the costs of Rs.2000/- to Andhra Pradesh Legal Services Authority, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.M SIVA KUMAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.DHARANI KUMAR B
2.
3.Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri M.Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Mattegunta Sudhir, learned counsel for respondents, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and hence nothing remains for adjudication and the same may be closed.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for parties, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 9TH September, 2026.
RR