Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/4258/2024 of MANYAM SIDDA REDDY Vs D PRABHAKAR REDDY (not pressed) on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4258/2024 Between: 1. MANYAM SIDDA REDDY, S/O. SIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO. 1/144, PUTTAYAPALLI VILLAGE,CHINTHALACHERUVU, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR

APHC010484892024

IN THE

WEDNESDAY

THE HONOURAB

CONT

Between:

1. MANYAM SIDDA RE

YEARS, OCC AGRIC

VILLAGE,CHINTHALA

DISTRICT.

2. BEERAM SIVARAMI

ABOUT 48 YEARS,

PUTTAYAPALLI

V

MANDAL, YSR KADA

3. BEERAM VENKATA

AGED ABOUT 55 YE

PUTTAYAPALLI

V

MANDAL, YSR KADA

4. MUDAMALA JAYARA

ABOUT 58 YEARS

PUTTAYAPALLI VIL

DISTRICT

1. D

PRABHAKAR R

DIVISIONAL LEVEL D

DISTRICT

C.C.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

Y, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

TEMPT CASE NO: 4258/2024

EDDY, S/O. SIDDA REDDY, AGED A

CULTURE, R/O D.NO. 1/144, PUTTA

ACHERUVU, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR

REDDY,, BEERAM SIVARAMI REDDY

OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO

VILLAGE,CHINTHALACHERUVU,

APA DISTRICT S/O. B NARASIMHA RE

SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. B NARAYANA

EARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.N

VILLAGE,CHINTHALACHERUVU,

APA DISTRICT

AMI REDDY, , S/O. M POLI REDDY

, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.N

LLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR

...PETIT

AND

REDDY

NOT

PRESSED,

(PREVIOU

DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ADHONI K

RC,J

No.4258 of 2024

H

ATI

ABOUT 50

AYAPALLI

R KADAPA

Y, AGED

. 1-160-2,

BADVEL

DDY,

A REDDY,

NO. 1-146,

BADVEL

Y, AGED

NO. 1-14,

KADAPA

TIONER(S)

US

DPO)

KURNOOL

RC,J

C.C.No.4258 of 2024

2. SRI G RAJALAKSHMI PRESENT DPO NOT PRESSED, THE

DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA RR1 AND 2 ARE NOT PRESSED FROM THIS CONTEMPT

CASE AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 18.11.2024 IN CC.NO.4258

OF 2024.

3. SRI

PERUMALLAGARI

VERNA

REDDYPREVIOUS

PS,

T.SANDRAPALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATI GOPAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

4. SRI B TIMMAIAH PRESENT PS, THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PUTTAYAPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR

KADAPA DISTRICT ST.

5. SRI A VENKATA RAMAIAH EXONERTED, THE EXECUTIVE

ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, MINOR

IRRIGATION WORKS DIVISION,KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

R5 IS EXONERATED FROM THIS CONTEMPT CASE AS PER

COURT ORDER DATED 24 04 2025 IN CC NO 4258 OF 2024

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein for willfully and deliberately violating the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.22190 of 2023, dated.05.09.2023 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may pleased to dispense with filing of the Certified Copy of the order passed in CC No. 4258 of 2024 dated 24.04.2025 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extending the time granted in order dated.24.4.2025 in C.C.No.4258/2024

RC,J

C.C.No.4258 of 2024

for paying the costs of Rs.2000/- to Andhra Pradesh Legal Services Authority, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.M SIVA KUMAR

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1.DHARANI KUMAR B

2.

3.Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri M.Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Mattegunta Sudhir, learned counsel for respondents, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and hence nothing remains for adjudication and the same may be closed.

2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for parties, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 9TH September, 2026.

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead