Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10803/2023 of SAVILI ANANDA RAO Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 8 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3002/2024 Between: 1. A BALAJI, S/O A NAGARAJ CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 8/353, KOTHAPETA, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 1.
APHC010295082024
IN THE H
(
WEDNESDAY
THE HONOURAB
CONT
Between:
1. A BALAJI, S/O A NA
RESIDENT OF 8/353
DISTRICT.
1. MUPPALA RAMESH
MUNICIPALITY, SRIK
2. SRI V SANJEEV KU
SRIKALAHASTI
MU
DISTRICT. R 2 IS SU
DATED 31/07/25
3. SRI
BHAVANI
SRIKALAHASTI MUN
AS PER COURT OR
2024.
Petition under Section
that in the circumstances s
be pleased to pleased to p
court for willful disobedienc
C.C.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
TEMPT CASE NO: 3002/2024
AGARAJ CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 5
3, KOTHAPETA, SRIKALAHASTI,
...PE
AND
H BABU, COMMISSIONER, SRIKA
KALAHASTI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.
UMAR, PRESENT INCHARGE COMM
UNICIPALITY
SRI
KALAHASTI,
UO MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER COUR
PRASAD,
MUNICIPAL
COMM
ICIPALITY R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS SU
RDER DATED 06.11.2025 IN CC NO
...CONTE
ns 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 19
tated in the affidavit file herein the High unish the respondents/contemnors for c ce in violating the orders of the Hon'ble RC,J
No.3002 of 2024
ATI
1 YEARS,
TIRUPATI
TITIONER
ALAHASTI
ISSIONER
,TIRUPATI
RT ORDER
MSSIONER
UO MOTU
O-3002 OF
MNOR(S):
971 praying
Court may
contempt of
High Court
RC,J
C.C.No.3002 of 2024
passed in W.P.No.9859/2024 dated 03.05.2024 under the Sections 10 to 12
of the Contempt of Courts Act to and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the 2nd respondent as Proposed Respondent No.2 in CC No. 3002 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the 1st Respondent for further hearings, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SHAIK RAFI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities
2.GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA
The Court made the following:
RC,J
C.C.No.3002 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri Shaik Rafi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Gudapati Lakshmi Narayana, learned counsel for respondents, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and hence nothing remains for adjudication and the same may be closed.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for parties, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 9TH September, 2026.
RR