Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/14104/2023 of PAMMI PRAVEEN CAREY Vs THE COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14104 OF 2023 Between: 1. PAMMI PRAVEEN CAREY, S/o Pammi Dhairya Aseervadam, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Junior

APHC010276572023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. PAMMI PRAVEEN CAREY, S/o Pammi Dhairya Aseervadam, Aged about 33

years, Occ. Junior Copmercial Executive, Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, Guntur Branch, Guntur, A.P, R/o H.No.3-101, Arun Kumar Church, Kadiyam, Vemagiri, East Godavari, A. P.

2. Rapaka Sudeep Sundar, S/o Rapaka Suguna Raju, Aged about 33 years, Occ.

Junior Commercial Executive, Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, Guntur Branch, Guntur, A.P, R/o Flat No. G-3, Nithya Residency, Bandlaguda Jagir, Abhyudaya Nagar Colony Kalimandir, Bandlaguda Jagir Kismathpur, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana - 500030.

3. Badugu Veerabhadra Rao, S/o Chandrasekhara Rao, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Junior Commercial Executive, Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, Guntur Branch, Guntur, A.P, R/o H.No. 5-158, Pedapeta, Ainavalli, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh - 533211.

4. Doddi Ram Prakash,, S/o. Doddi Nataraj Kumar, Aged about 33 years, Occ.

Junior Commercial Executive, Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, Guntur Branch, Guntur, A.P, R/o Door No. 25-3-14,Adapavari Street, R.Agraharam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioners

AND

1. THE COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, Rep. by its Chief General Manager (HRD), Kapas Bhawan, Plot No.3/A, Sector 10, CBD, Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400 614.

2. The Branch Manager, Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, 4/2, Ashok Nagar, Guntur, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the proceedings ref No. CCl/GNT/HRD/ 2023-24/21 dated 12.04.2023 to hand over the charge to the permanent employees and report to the branch office at Guntur without receiving reply/explanation to the show cause notice within time as per the orders of the Hon'ble High court for the state of Telangana in W.P.Nos.767/2017, 860/2017, 451/2017 and 2965/2017 to submit the reply/explanation within 4 weeks as illegal, arbitrary unjust, violative of the principles of natural Justice and violation of the ArtiLles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the proceedings vide ref No.

CCl/GNT/HRD/2023-24/21 dated 12. 04. 2023 issued by the respondent authority and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to Terminate the petitioners pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: KARRA SUDHAKAR

Counsel for the Respondents: MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO

The Court made the following order:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the proceedings ref No. CCl/GNT/HRD/ 2023- 24/21 dated 12.04.2023 to hand over the charge to the permanent employees and report to the branch office at Guntur without receiving reply/explanation to the show cause notice within time as per the orders of the Hon'ble High court for the state of Telangana in W.P.Nos.767/2017, 860/2017, 451/2017 and 2965/2017 to submit the reply/explanation within 4 weeks as illegal, arbitrary unjust, violative of the principles of natural Justice and violation of the ArtiLles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the proceedings vide ref No. CCl/GNT/HRD/2023-24/21 dated 12. 04. 2023 issued by the respondent authority …..”

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners brought to the notice of the Court that the services of the petitioners had already been terminated. In view thereof, learned counsel submitted that the relief sought in the present writ petition does not survive for consideration.

3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 09.09.2026 SAK

61

Date: 09.09.2026

SAK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead