WP/16139/2019 of Siddhi Ramappa, aliasJangama Ramesh, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 7 September 2026

APHC010340542019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. SIDDHI RAMAPPA, ALIASJANGAMA RAMESH,, S.O VEERABHADRAPPA

ALIAS JANGAMA BHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST, RO.SRIDHARGATTA

VILLAGE,

BOMMANAHALLI

MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

2. SMT. SAROJAMMA, W/O. RAMANJINI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O.SRIDHARGATTA VILLAGE, BOMMANAHALLI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BOMMANAHALLI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BOMMANAHALLI, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT,

6. THE TAHSILDAR, BOMMANAHALLI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

7. M SHIVARAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE MOTHUKURI SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 45, 2RLD

PHASE,

BHAGYA

NAGAR,

KUKATPALLI,

HYDERABAD

CITY,

TELANGANA.

8. Y KALIKAMOA, W/O SHANKAR RAO, AGED MAJOR, HINDU, R/O

SITHARAM NAGAR CAMP VILLAGE, KANEKAL MANDAL.

9. K MALLAPA, S/O VANNURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, SREEDHARAGATTA

VILLAGE

AND

POST,

BORNMANANAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.

10. M PINAKINI, W/O M.SHIVARAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO. 45, 2ND PHASE, BHAGYA NAGAR, KUKATPALLI, HYDERABAD CITY, TELANGANA

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of certiorari calling for all the connected records including the impungned proceeding in R.C. 148-B-2019 dated 13-09-2019 of the 6th respondent and quash the same as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, and in violation of principles of Natural Justice and violative of Articles 300-A and 21 of the Constitution of India and further declare that the petitioners are entitled to continue to enjoy their land in Sy.No.198-B2A2 to an extent of Ac.3- 00 cents and Sy.Nlo.198- B2A3 to an extent of Ac.3-00 cents of Singanahalli Village, Bommanhall Mandal, Anantapur District., in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with possession of the petitioners in respect of the land in Sy.No.198-B2A2 to an extent of Ac.3-00 cents and in Sy.No.198-B2A3 to an ex¬tent of Ac.3-00 cents of Singanahalli Village, Bommanhalli Mandal, Anantapur District by suspending the operation of the endorsement in L.Dis 148/D/2019 dat¬ed 21-09-2019, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. SESHADRI GOALLA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME (AP)

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

3. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI

The Court made the following: