Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2163/2026 of Ponnekanti Venkata Rao Vs Sri Sai Prasad, I.A.S on 7 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2163/2026 Between: 1. PONNEKANTI VENKATA RAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED 78 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-40,
APHC010306932026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2163/2026
Between:
1. PONNEKANTI VENKATA RAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED 78
YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-40, CHINNAKAKANI VILLAGE MANGALAGIRI
MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. PONNEKANTI SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O P. VENKATA RAO, AGED 44
YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-40, CHINNAKAKANI VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI
MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. SRI SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
SECRATARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI THAMEEM ANSARIYA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SMT A LAKSHMI KUMARI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TENALI
DIVISION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. SRI K DINESH KUMAR, TAHSILDAR MANGALAGIRI, MANGALAGIRI
VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents 1 to 4 herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their wilful and intentional disobedience of the orders of the
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P V MAHESH
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SUSHMA YAGANTI
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.2163 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the respondents furnished proceedings dated 07.09.2026, (which forms part or record), wherein it indicates that the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court.
2. In view of the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. If at all the petitioners are aggrieved by proceedings dated 07.09.2026, they are at liberty to challenge proceedings before appropriate authority in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 08.09.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.2163 of 2026
08.09.2026 KBN