Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15702/2020 of Siddha Ramappa, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 7 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15702/2020 Between: 1. SIDDHA RAMAPPA,, FATHER NAME VEERABHADRAPPA, AGE 55 ADDRESS OCC AGRICULTURIST,
APHC010238422020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. SIDDHA RAMAPPA,, FATHER NAME VEERABHADRAPPA, AGE 55
ADDRESS OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O.SRIDHARGATTA VILLAGE, BOMMANAHALLI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR
2. SMT. SAROJAMMA, W/O. RAMANJINI, AGE 41 ADDRESS OCC
HOUSEWIFE,
R/O.SRIDHARGATTA
VILLAGE,
BOMMANAHALLI
MANDAL, ANANTAPUR
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
2. THE
CIRCLE
INSPECTOR,
BOMMANAHALLI,
ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT,
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR POLICE, BOMMANAHALLI ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT,
4. THE
TAHSILDAR,
BOMMANAHALLI
MANDAL,
ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT.
5. M
SHIVARAMAKRISHNA,
,
S/O
LATE
MOTHUKURI
SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 45, 2ND PHASE, BHAGYA NAGAR, KUKATPALLI, HYDERABAD CITY, TELANGANA.
6. Y KALIKAMBA, W/O SHANKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, R/O, SREEDHARAGATTA
VILLAGE
AND
POST,
BOMMANAHAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT
7. K MALLAPA, S/O VANNURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, SREEDHARAGATTA
VILLAGE
AND
POST,
BOMMANAHAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
8. M PINAKINI, W/O M.SHIVARAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 55
YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO. 45, 2ND PHASE, BHAGYA NAGAR, KUKATPALLI, HYDERABAD CITY, TELANGANA
9. GOLLA
KISTAPPA,
S/O
KISTAPPA
CULTIVATION,
SREEDHARAGATTA VILLAGE AND POST, BOMMANAHAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in providing police aid for implementation of an injunction order granted in favour of the Petitioners on 05.07.2019 in 1.A.
287/2019 in 0.S.No.88/2019 on the file of Junior Civil Judge Rayadurg restraining respondent Nos. 5 to 10 from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of Petitioners in respect of their land in Sy.No.198- B2A2 to an extent of Ac.3-00 cents, Sy.No.198-B2A3 to an extent of Ae.3-00
cents of Singanahalli Village, Bommanhalli Mandal, Anantapur and extended time to time as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, and Violative of principles of Natural Justice and contrary to law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the respondents No.2 to 3 kindly grant provide the police aid for implementation of an injunction order granted in favour of the Petitioners on 05.07.2019 in I.A.
287/2019 in O.S.No.88/2019 on the file of Junior Civil Judge Rayadurg restraining Respondent Nos. 5 to 10 from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of Petitioners in respect of their land in Sy.No.198-B2A2 to an extent of Ac.3-00 cents, Sy.No.198-B2A3 to an extent of Ac.3-00 cents of Singanahalli Village, Bommanhalli Mandal, Anantapur pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SESHADRI GOALLA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI
3. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that this Writ Petition may be closed by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the learned Trial Court where the suit in O.S.No.88 of 2019 is pending to explore his grievance in respect of the order passed in I.A.No. 287 of 2019 in O.S.No.88 of 2019 on the file of Junior Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rayadurg.
2. This petition is filed seeking police aid in implementation of injunction order passed in the said petition in I.A.No.287 of 2019 in O.S.No.88 of 2019 for violation of the injunction order, the petitioners can approach the same court under Order XXXIX Rule 2 A of Code of Civil Procedure.
3. Recorded the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed with a liberty to the petitioners to approach the court concerned, if they have no grievance in respect of implementation of the order passed in I.A.No.287 of 2019 in O.S.No.88 of 2019 on the file of Junior Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rayadurg. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________
SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 08.09.2026
SSA/CJP
Date: 08.09.2026 SSA/CJP