Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25368/2026 of Kondamadugula Jayarami Reddy, Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 7 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 25368/2026 Between: 1. KONDAMADUGULA JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOVE 59 YEARS, OCC ASSISTANT SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE
APHC010461042026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25368/2026
Between:
1. KONDAMADUGULA JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOVE 59 YEARS, OCC
ASSISTANT
SECRETARY,
AGRICULTURE
MARKET
COMMITTEE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 526232
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF
SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, SERICULTURE, COOPERATION AND
MARKETING
DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT -522238.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT,
AGRICULTURE
MARKET
COMMITTEE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238
3. COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR,
AGRICULTURE
MARKET
COMMITTEE CHUTTUGUNTA CIRCLE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR
DISTRICT - 522004
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 3 rd Respondent is denying the case of the petitioner for promotion to the Secretary Grade-III on the ground of pendency of the Article of Charges as illegal, arbitrary and in
violation of Article 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India and G.O. Ms. No.
257 GAD Department, Dated 10-6-1999 Consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to promote the petitioner as Secretary Grade-III as per G.O. Ms.
No. 257 GAD Department, Dated 10-6-1999, without reference of Article of Charges in existing vacancies IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Secretary Grade-III without reference to the Article of Charges in the existing vacancies forthwith in terms of as per G.O. Ms. No. 257 GAD
Department, Dated 10-6-1999 pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHEJARLA VENKATESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Grade-III Secretary on the ground of pendency of disciplinary proceedings initiated pursuant to the articles of charge issued vide G.O.Rt.No.291, Agriculture and Cooperation (VIG-II) Department, dated 16.05.2025, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition are that the petitioner has been working as Assistant Secretary, Agricultural Market Committee, Ongole, since 2025. While so, articles of charge were issued against the petitioner on 16.05.2025, making certain allegations. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted his explanation dated 29.05.2026, denying the allegations contained therein. In spite of the lapse of three and a half months, there has been no progress in the disciplinary enquiry. The petitioner is now eligible for promotion to the post of Grade-III Secretary. However, the case of the petitioner is not being considered for promotion to the said post on account of the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings. Hence, the present writ petition.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Government has prescribed a timeline for concluding departmental enquiries, specifically three months in cases which are simple in nature and six months in cases which are complex in nature, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.679, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 01.11.2009, read with G.O.Ms.No.91, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 12.09.2022. However, the respondents have not adhered to the aforesaid timelines for concluding the enquiry. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be denied his right to be considered for promotion. Even otherwise, the petitioner is entitled to be considered for promotion in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999.
4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on the other hand, submits that the enquiry would be concluded as expeditiously as possible.
5. Having heard the respective counsel and taking note of the fact that there has been no progress in the disciplinary enquiry, which is contrary to the time frame prescribed vide G.O.Ms.No.91, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 12.09.2022, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition, with the consent of both the learned counsel, at the stage of admission, with the following directions: i. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Grade-III Secretary in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999, if the petitioner is otherwise within the zone of consideration and possesses the requisite qualifications.
ii. The respondents are further directed to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within a period of six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii. The Disciplinary Authority, as well as the Enquiry Officer and the Presenting Officer, shall be personally answerable in the event the enquiry is not concluded within the time frame referred to above.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand dismissed.
_______________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
8th September, 2026 cbn/cst
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION No.25368 of 2026
8th September, 2026 cbn/cst