Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25633/2026 of M. Tarakeswara Rao, Vs The State of A.P. on 7 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [0] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 25633/2026 Between: M. Tarakeswara Rao, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A P and Others
APHC010469992026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25633/2026
Between:
M. Tarakeswara Rao,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of A P and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T S N SUDHAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION NO: 25633 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.3 in not considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The Petitioner was initially appointed as Junior Assistant in the year 2001 and thereafter, he was promoted as Senior Assistant in the year 2017 in Respondent No.3-Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation. Though the Petitioner had completed Nine years of service as Senior Assistant and passed all the Departmental Tests, his case is not being considered for promotion though the individuals appointed as Senior Assistant subsequent to the Petitioner were being promoted to the post of Superintendent. Pursuant thereto, the Petitioner submitted a Representation on 11.08.2026 to that effect. Hence, the present Writ Petition.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the representation of the Petitioner will be examined and appropriate decision will be communicated to the Petitioner.
4. Heard the learned counsels.
3. Considering the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-
(i) The Respondent No.3 is directed to examine the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. .
(ii) No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 08.09.2026 MMK/eha
W.P. No.25633 of 2026 Dt: 08.09.2026
MMK/eha