Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23365/2026 of Maddela Srinivasulu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 7 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 23365 OF 2026 Between: 1. Maddela Srinivasulu, S/o. Late Maddela Venkateswarulu, Aged about 53 yrs, Occ Business,
APHC010429672026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Maddela Srinivasulu, S/o. Late Maddela Venkateswarulu, Aged about 53 yrs, Occ Business, R/o. D.No.4-3-219, Stonehousepet, Nellore City, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh.
2. Maddela Kamalamma, W/o Maddela Venkateshwarlu, Aged about 71 Yrs, Occ Not working R/o flat No.303, 3rd Floor, Medha Sri Apartment, AC Nagr Last, Beside Old Kinnera Apartments, VTC Nellore, PO Stonehousepet, Nellore District, AP. ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Dept of Municipal Administration and urban development. Secretary Buildings, Velagapudi Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
2. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority VUDA, Rep.by its Commissioner, 8th Floor, Udyog Bhavan Complex, Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam - 530003, Andhra Pradesh.
3. Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Rep.by its Commissioner, 8th Floor, Vuda Complex, Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 530003.
4. P M Palem Circle Inspector, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and . 3 in trying to evict the Petitioners from their land admeasuring Ac 3.00 covered under Survey Nos. 71/2G, 71/2D and 71/2of Paradesipalem Village, Visakhapatnam District, which is illegal, arbitrary and also violation of Article 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and also against the Municipality Corporation Act 1955and consequently to direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 and their Staff not to dispossess and disturb the peaceful possessions and enjoyment of the Petitioners from their land and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to dispossess and disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners from theirland admeasuring Ac 3.00 covered under Survey Nos. 71/2G, 71/2D and 71/2of Paradesipalem Village, Visakhapatnam District, A.P., and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: P.VENKATA NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents: GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
The Court made the following Order:
Sri Duggireddy Sreenath Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri P. Venkata Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 08-09-2026 MSI
Dated: 08-09-2026 MSI