Andhra Pradesh High Court

WA/1052/2026 of CHIRUMAMILLA BHUJANGA RAO Vs R V MURALI RAGHAVA KUMAR on 7 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1052 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:- L.M.1 [3584] Chirumamilla Bhujanga Rao ...Appellant Vs. R. V. Murali Raghava Kumar and others ...Respondent(s) ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 8th September,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

APHC010472572026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

WRIT APPEAL NO: 1052 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:- L.M.1

Chirumamilla Bhujanga Rao ...Appellant Vs. R. V. Murali Raghava Kumar and others ...Respondent(s) ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 8th September, 2026. Present : Advocate for Appellant: Mr. Veladi Sai Sri Harsha Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. D. V. Sasidhar, Mr. Kappera Koteswara Rao (SC for Endowments, A.P. Region), GP for Endowments LISA GILL, CJ.

Admittedly, present appeal has been filed challenging interlocutory order dated 31.08.2026, whereby it has been noted by learned writ Court that there is no representation on behalf of unofficial respondents; official respondents were directed to take appropriate steps for protecting the land as described therein and to take steps for demolition of illegal constructions, if any, on subject land and report within a period of three weeks. Matter was then listed for hearing on 21.09.2026.

2. Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that arguments in the matter were heard on 17.08.2026 and matter was adjourned to 31.08.2026, at request of learned counsel for present appellant.

HCJ & CGRJ WA_1052_2026

3. Learned counsel for appellant submits that it is due to certain unavoidable circumstances that he could not remain present before learned writ Court on 31.08.2026, otherwise, the entire position would have been clarified as is so mentioned in application seeking vacation of interim order dated 30.06.2025 passed in Writ Petition.

4. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for appellant prays for liberty to file appropriate application before learned writ Court for recall of order dated 31.08.2026, bringing entire facts and circumstances of the case before writ Court.

5. In the given facts and circumstances and without expression of opinion on merits of the matter, this writ appeal is disposed of with liberty to appellant to file appropriate application for recall of order dated 31.08.2026. In case such an application is filed within a day, let the same be listed before appropriate Bench.

No costs. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

LISA GILL, CJ.

CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J. SSN Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned

: Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable

: Yes / No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead