Andhra Pradesh High Court
CEA/196/2010 of The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Vs M/s. Nagarjuna Agrichem Limited, on 7 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO: 196/2010 Between: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
APHC010597412010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS,, VISAKHAPATNAM-I COMMISSIONERATE, PORT AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 035
...APPELLANT AND
1. M/S NAGARJUNA AGRICHEM LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ARINAMA AKKIVALASA, PO, ALLINAGARAM, ETCHERLA MANDAL,
...RESPONDENT To set aside the Hon'ble CESTAT's final order No. 899/2009, dt.28-04- 2009 in Appeal No./99/08 & E/COD/219/08 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CEAMP 173 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Final Order No. 899/2009 dt.28-04-2009 in Appeal Ex.No.99/2008 & E/COD/219/2008, pending disposal of the main Appeal in CEA No. of 2010 in the interests of Justice and to pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2010(CEAMP 283 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased post thee above appeal " For Being Mentioned" for releasing the above matter from the batch of appeal which were decided on 20.08.2010 in CEA No.95/2010 and batch. Counsel for the Appellant:
1. VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondent:
1. G PRABHAKARA SASTRY The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the appellant-Department has placed instructions dated 06.08.2024, wherein it is stated that the appellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy and under the said policy, it has been resolved not to initiate any appeals or petitions, where the monitory stakes involved are less than Rs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
2. The instructions are placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 08.09.2026 KNN
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
Date:08.09.2026 KNN