Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24498/2026 of BOSA RAGHURAM REDDY Vs THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH AT HYDERABAD on 6 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 24498 OF 2026 Between: 1. BOSA RAGHURAM REDDY, S/o B Venkat Ramana Aged
APHC010437852026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BOSA RAGHURAM REDDY, S/o B Venkat Ramana Aged about 46 years Occ Postal Assistant R/o 53 5 29 Ammorivari Veedhi Maddilapalem Pedda Nuyya Vishakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh 530013 ...Petitioner AND
1. THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH AT HYDERABAD, at Hyderabad Rep by its Registrar Circuit Bench at Vijayawada Stalin Corporate Building Auto Nagar N T R District Vijayawada 520007
2. The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary Ministry of Communications and Information Technology Department of Posts Dak Bhawan Sansad Marg New Delhi 110001
3. The Chief Postmaster General Andhra Pradesh Circle, Department of Posts Satyanarayana Nagar Krishna Lanka Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh N T R District 520013
4. The Post Master General, Visakhapatnam Region Department of Post MVP Colony Visakhapatnam 530017
5. The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Visakhapatnam Division Department of Post O/o The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh 530001
6. The Head Postmaster, Visakhapatnam Department of Post Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh 530001 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 1 in not passing orders despite dismissing by order dt 17.12.2025 in O A No 1357 2025 and not uploading order in website is illegal irregular irrational in violation of judgement dt 29.05.2026 in W P CrI No 169 2025 passed by the Honible Supreme Court in violation of Central Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 and rules framed there under in violation of Articles 14 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondent No 1 to pass reasoned orders as contemplated under Section 19 3 and Section 22 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 Counsel for the Petitioner: V.N.V.SURYA DATTU Counsel for the Respondents: JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) The Court made the following order:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
Sri Petluri Nagaraju, learned counsel representing Sri V.N.V. Surya Dattu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous and the petition be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
___________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR,J
Dated: 07.09.2026 SRT
125
Dated: 07.09.2026 SRT