Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25316/2026 of MARELLA SANJANA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25316 OF 2026 Between: 1. MARELLA SANJANA, , W/o. M. Vivekananda, aged
APHC010465972026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MARELLA SANJANA, , W/o. M. Vivekananda, aged 36 years, Occ Household, R/o. 11-143, Opp Sindhu International Hotel, Tiruchanur, Tirupati District ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi at Velagapudi, Guntur District 522237.
2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District 522501.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District 517501.
4. The Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Tirupati 517501 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent No.'s 4 viz., Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Tirupati to produce the detenu viz., M. Vivekananda before this Hon'ble court and he may be released after declaring his detention at Central Crime Station, Tirupati as illegal and unconstitutional Counsel for the Petitioner: D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. He further submits that the matter may be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
___________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR,J
Dated: 07.09.2026 AG
173
Dated: 07.09.2026 AG