Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/29133/2013 of Oruganti S.N.L.P.Devi, D/o Satyanarayana Murthy Vs High Court of Andhra Pradesh on 6 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 29133 OF 2013 Between: 1. Oruganti S.N.L.P.Devi, D/o Satyanarayana Murthy,
APHC010023882013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NO: 29133 OF 2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Oruganti S.N.L.P.Devi, D/o Satyanarayana Murthy, Stenographer, R/o Kakinada, East Godavari Dist. ...Petitioner AND
1. High Court of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Registrar General, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Registrar Recruitment, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.
3. The District Judge, East Godavari Dist., at Rajahmundry.
4. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, General Administration (Ser-A) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider for relaxation of upper age limit by 2 years from 34 years to 36 years in the recruitment process sought to be conducted through notification Nos. 2/2013 and 3/2013 dated 25.9.2013 issued by the respondent No.3 declaring fixation of maximum age limit as 34 years as illegal and ultra vires to the provisions of Part-III of the Constitution of India, besides directing not to proceed further with the selection process in respect of the post notified through notification Nos. 2/2013 and 3/2013 dated 25.9.2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 36185 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 to recerive my application being submitted for consideration for the posts notified through Notification Nos.2/2013 and 3/2013 dated 25.9.2013 issued by the respondent No.3 irrespective of the maximum age limit of 34 years, pending final disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondents: V HIMABINDU Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondents:0 The Court made the following order:
WRIT PETITION No: 29133 OF 2013
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)
Ms. S. Sai Sneha, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause of action does not survive in the writ petition.
2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
_______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J
GVK
AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION No. 29133 OF 2013
Dt. 07.09.2026
GVK