Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25115/2026 of Smt. Gollangi Padmavathi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 6 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 25115 OF 2026 Between: 1. SMT. GOLLANGI PADMAVATHI, W/O. SRINU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. DAILY LABOUR,
APHC010462532026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25115 OF 2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT. GOLLANGI PADMAVATHI, W/O. SRINU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. DAILY LABOUR, RIO. DOOR NO.14-32-109/265/A, ASHOK NAGAR, REVENUE WARD NO.50, PEDAGANTYADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, GAJUWAKA ZONE, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. TAHSILDAR, PEDAGANTYADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri S.Abdul Matheen, learned counsel appearing for Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri ASC Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation appearing for respondent Nos.2.
2. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is against the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in attempting to demolish the subject structures bearing Door No.14-32-109/265/A situated in an extent of 140 Sq. Yds in Sy.No.274, Ashok Nagar, Pedagantyada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri ASC Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation appearing for respondent Nos.2 & 3 has placed before the Court a copy of the written instructions received from the Assistant City Planner, Gajuwaka Zone, GVMC dated 03.09.2026. A perusal of the same would reflect that the respondent- Corporation did not make any attempt to disturb the possession of the petitioner. If the respondents propose to take any action, the same shall be in accordance with law.
4. The written instructions of the Assistant City Planner, Gajuwaka Zone, GVMC dated 03.09.2026 is placed on record.
5. Having regard to the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 07.09.2026 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25115 OF 2026
Dated: 07.09.2026 BSK