Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2763/2026 of The God Neelakanteswara Swamy, Vs Durgeswara Rao, on 6 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2763/2026 Between: 1. THE GOD NEELAKANTESWARA SWAMY,, REP. BY ITS. DONORS GANGAVARAPU BRAHMANANDAM,
APHC010370312026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2763/2026
Between:
1. THE GOD NEELAKANTESWARA SWAMY,, REP. BY ITS. DONORS
GANGAVARAPU BRAHMANANDAM, GANGAVARAPU PERAIAH, R/O.
NEMALIPURI VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. GANGAVARAPU
BRAHMANANDAM,,
S/O.
VEERAIAH,
R/O.
NEMALIPURI VILLAGE RAJUPALEM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. GANGAVARAPU PERAIAH,, S/O. (LATE) VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT
60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. D.NO. 337, NEMALIPURI
VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. DURGESWARA RAO, The Mandal Tahsildar, Rajupalem Mandal, Rajupalem, Palnadu District, Erstwhile Guntur District - 522 412.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent Under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully, deliberately and intentional violation of the orders of this Honble Court, dated 25-02-2026 passed in W.P.
No. 35742 of 2022, and pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KRANTHI KUMAR PASUMARTHI
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. SUSHMA YAGANTI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
Heard Mr. Kranthi Kumar Pasumarthi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Sushma Yaganti, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The instant contempt case is filed against the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.35742 of 2022 dated 25.02.2026.
3. When the matter has been taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the respondent has placed before the Court a copy of the order passed by the Tahsildar dated 08.07.2026. In terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.35742 of 2022 dated 25.02.2026, an opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners, respondents and other interested parties. Thereafter, enquiry was conducted. After conducting the enquiry, the parties are advised to approach the competent Civil Court for adjudication of their grievance.
4. Having regard to the same and as the directions of this Court have been complied with, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 07.09.2026 ANI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO:2763 of 2026
Dated:07.09.2026
ANI