Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25122/2026 of Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 25122/2026 Between: Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
APHC010462182026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25122/2026
Between:
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N ASHWANI KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.25122 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
The Present Writ Petition is filed seeking restraining the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 from proceeding with or adjudicating upon the representation dated 24.08.2026 bearing PGRS No.GNT202608249153 submitted by the Respondent No.2.
2. The Respondent No.3 was appointed as Transportation Supervisor in the Petitioner’s institution on 29.07.2025. Subsequently, the said individual had left the institution due to domestic issues and had sought for Relieving Letter. As the same has not been furnished, a grievance was raised under PGRS on 24.08.2026. Pursuant thereto, the Respondent No.2 issued the impugned Proceedings to the petitioner seeking for remarks on the above representation. Questioning the same, the present writ petition is filed on the ground that the Respondent No.2 does not have the jurisdiction to initiate the impugned proceedings.
3. Heard the learned counsels.
4. The issue with regard to the lack of jurisdiction by the Respondent No.2 could also be raised before the Respondent authority as well rather than in this Writ Petition.
5. Therefore, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
i) The petitioner shall be at liberty to give its objections on the impugned Notice including the issue of jurisdiction to the Respondent No.2.
ii) Upon receipt of the objections, the Respondent No. 2 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders.
iii) There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.09.2026 MMK/eha
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WP No.25122 of 2026 Dt: 03.09.2026
MMK/eha