Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3492/2025 of BOLLIMPALLI VENKATA SRINIVAS Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 2 September 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010060102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 3492/2025 Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010060102025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 3492/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BOLLIMPALLI VENKATA SRINIVAS, S/O VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY LATE, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT. GOVT. MEDICAL COLLEGE, ELURU.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, AP GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, ZONE-LL, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein more particularly the 3rd respondent herein in not taking further action, basing on the Regional Medical Board Reports submitted by the Chairman/Superintendent, Govt. General Hospital,Kakinada vide proceeding Rc.No.222/SI.No.03/G1/2024, dated 21-3- 2024 as per G.O.Ms.No.661,GAD dated 23-10-2008 for retirement of the petitioner on medical grounds as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequential the Hon'ble Court may pleased to direct the 3rd respondent herein to take further action basing on the Regional Medical Board Reports submitted by the Chairman/ Superintendent, Govt. General Hospital, Kakinada vide proceeding Rc.No.222/SI.No.03/ G1/2024, dated 21-3-2024 as per G.O.Ms.No.661,GAD dated 23-10- 2008 for retirement of the petitioner on medical grounds, without further delay and may pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent herein to take further action basing on the Regional Medical Board Reports submitted by the Chairman/ Superintendent, Govt. General Hospital, Kakinada vide proceeding Rc.No.222/SI.No .03/ G1/2024, dated 21-3-2024 as per G.O.Ms.No.661,GAD dated 23-10- 2008 for retirement of the petitioner on medical grounds, pending disposal of the present writ petition and may pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to allowed the present lA in WP.No.3492/2025 by impleading the proposed respondent No. 4 as party respondent to the pending Writ Petition and may pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following:
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.3492 of 2025 O R DE R:
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.09.2026 KLP