Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLA/118/2019 of E.VENKATANARAYANA Vs STATE OF AP on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 118/2019 Between: 1. E.VENKATANARAYANA, D.NO. 8-315-F3, 7TH LANE, RAJENDRANAGAR, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA
APHC010032502019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. E.VENKATANARAYANA,
D.NO.
8-315-F3,
7TH
LANE,
RAJENDRANAGAR, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY
AT D.NO. 12-281-1, RUSTUMBAD, MACHILIPATNAM
...APELLANT
AND
1. STATE OF AP, HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARAVATHI
2. SESHAN VENKATANARASAIAH, R/O.VADLAMANNADU VILLAGE, GUDLAVALLERU MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST
...RESPODENT(S):
Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the judgment made in CC. 139/2017
dated 22.01.2019 on the file of the principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudivasa krishna district in dismissing the complaint filed by the appellant under section 138 and 142 NI Act IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant leave to present the Criminal Appeal against the judgment made in CC NO.139/2017 (old CC.No.186/2016 of AJFCM Court, Gudivada), dated 22.01.2019 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge cum Judicial First Class magistrate, Gudivada, Krishna Dist.
Counsel for the Apellant:
1. K VENKATESH
Counsel for the Respodent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. B SOMASEKHAR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Sri K. Venkatesh, learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the matter is settled out of the Court and accordingly, he has filed memo dated 01.09.2026 and requested to dismiss this appeal.
2. The Appellant who is complainant filed complaint against the Respondent No.2 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
3. As seen from the memo dated 01.09.2026, both parties settled their issues out of Court.
4. Recorded the said submission of the learned counsel for the Appellant and contents of memo dated 01.09.2026.
5. In view of the settlement between both parties, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as Withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 03.09.2026 SSA/CJP
Date: 03.09.2026 SSA/CJP