Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9369/2026 of M/s. Keerthi Security Services and Housekeeping Vs THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 2 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9369/2026 Between: M/s. Keerthi Security Services And Housekeeping ...PETITIONER AND The
APHC010168462026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 9369/2026
Between:
M/s. Keerthi Security Services And Housekeeping
...PETITIONER
AND
The Employees State Insurance Corporation Esic and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. T BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K SANGAN NAIDU
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following order:
Challenging the orders vide order No.7000-052053-000-1001 dated 27.08.2021 issued under Section 45A of the ESI Act demanding a sum of Rs.10,47,173/- and the consequential order dated 29.10.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent, the present writ petition is filed.
2. Heard Sri T.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner wants to avail alternative remedy and accordingly prayed to dispose of the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents reported no objection.
5. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy, if available in accordance with law. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS