Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/22137/2025 of SUVVADA NARAYANA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 22137 OF 2025 Between: 1. SUVVADA NARAYANA, S/o Venkata Swamy, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Agriculturist, R/o.

APHC010424532025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 22137 OF 2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SUVVADA NARAYANA, S/o Venkata Swamy, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Agriculturist, R/o. Door No. 26-14-71/1, Velampeta, One Town Area, Visakhapatnam District, AP.

2. Bipilli Ramu, S/o Late Krishnam, Aged 49 years, Resident of Door No. 3-1, Ramalayam Street, Bakkannapalem, Visakhapatnam Urban and District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioners AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

2. The Collector and District, The Collector and District Magistrate, Vishakapatnam District, Visakhapatnam.

3. The Greater Visakhapatnam, The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Rep. by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam, Vishakapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed, illegal monopoly action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No. 3 in demolishing the part of shutters and the shed without issuing any prior notice or intimation and demolished the same on 07.08.2025 within the premises of land in Miot No. 82 which is an extent of 808.88 Sq. Yards or 676.32 Sq. Meters of Survey No. 232/7 of Madhurawada Village, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District which is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to follow the procedure as mandated by the municipal rule and regulations, strictly in accordence with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners, in the subject land which is in Plot No. 82 an extent of 808.88 sq yards or 676.32 Sq. Meters of Survey No. 232/7 of Madhurawada Village, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District, without following the procedure as stipulated under the act, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to post the matter under the caption of for being mention and to make corrections in interim order dated 21.08.2025 in IA. No. 1 of 2025 in WP. No. 22137 of 2025 in Para No. 1 of 7th line i.e., mentioned as 2nd respondent instead of 2nd petitioner and further in Para 3 of direction given to the 2nd respondent instead of 3rd respondent and pass

Counsel for the Petitioners: ELURU SESHA MAHESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents: A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) Counsel for the Respondents: GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following Order:

Sri Eluru Sesha Mahesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter before the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 03-09-2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 22137 OF 2025

Dated: 03-09-2026 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead