Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/27845/2025 of SADI APPALA RAJU REDDY Vs THE STATE OF AP on 2 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27845 OF 2025 Between: 1. SADI APPALA RAJU REDDY, S/o. Late Apparao, Aged 51 years, Occ
APHC010537882025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO
KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 27845 OF 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SADI APPALA RAJU REDDY, S/o. Late Apparao, Aged 51 years, Occ Advocate, R/o.D.No.2-35, Boyapalem (Jn), Gambheeram (P), Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2
2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, Visakhapatnam District. 3.
3. The Station House Officer, Anandapuram Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 4.
4. Vanapalli Yerrayyamma, W/o. Late Suryanarayana, Aged about years, R/o. D.No.2-26, Boyapalem Junction, Gambheeram (P), Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
5.
5. Vanapalli Mutyala Rao, S/o. Late Suryanarayana, Aged about 49 years, R/o. D.No.2-26, Boyapalem Junction, Gambheeram (P), Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.
6. Vanapalli Trimurthulu, S/o. Late Suryanarayana, Aged about 47 years, R/o. D.No.2-26, Boyapalem Junction, Gambheeram (P), Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondents 2 and 3 in not registering the crime on petitioners repeated complaints, last one dated 26.08.2025 against the respondents 4 to 6 and their bench men on the file of 3rd respondent, in spite of the law laid down by Honble Supreme Court of India in K Lalita Kumari vs Govt.of U.P. Ors and Ramesh Kumari vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi), as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the crime and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rdrespondent to register the crime on petitioner’s complaint dated 26.08.2025 and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: TANUJA DUNGI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27845 of 2025 The Court made the following Order:
Instant Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondents 2 and 3 in not registering the crime on petitioners repeated complaints, last one dated 26.08.2025 against the respondents 4 to 6 and their bench men on the file of 3rd respondent, in spite of the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in K. Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P. and Ors and Ramesh Kumari vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi), as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the crime and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law and pass”.
2. Conspectus of facts in the present Writ Petition is that, despite the petitioner’s complaint to the police personnel, the respondent police are not acting upon the same by registering an FIR, thereby lodging criminal proceedings
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home basing on the Written Instructions dated 14.10.2025 of the Inspector of Police, Anandapuram P.S., Visakhapatnam City, submits that basing on the petitioner's complaint, police registered FIR in Crime No.115 of 2025 of Anandapuram Police Station and the investigation is going on.
4. At that juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the factum of registration of FIR.
5. Recording the submission made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 03.09.2026 krk
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 27845 of 2025
Date: 03.09.2026
krk