Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2400/2026 of Smt. Ponaka Devasena, Vs Smt. Eega Eega Ramdevi on 1 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2400/2026 Between: 1. SMT. PONAKA DEVASENA,, W/O LATE CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RJO
APHC010348742026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2400/2026
Between:
1. SMT. PONAKA DEVASENA,, W/O LATE CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RJO PEDDACHERUKURU VILLAGE, NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524004.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SMT EEGA EEGA RAMDEVI, Occ. Tahsildar, Manubolu Mandal SPSR
Nellore District - 524405.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the Respondent/Contemnor, try him for committing willful contempt of the Court's order dated 23.04.2026 passed in W.P. No. 10850 of 2026, punish him in accordance with law under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. K M KRISHNA REDDY
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.2400 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner herein filed an application through PGRS Grievance No.NLR202509151306 dated 15.09.2025, requesting the authorities for removal of the illegal encroachments. Basing on the said application, the 3rd respondent in the writ petition issued notice dated 06.12.2025 and 09.01.2026 calling both the petitioner and unofficial respondent in the writ petition for enquiry. Thereafter, the respondent authorities have not taken any action on the enquiry report. This Court vide order dated 23.04.2026 directing the respondent authorities to take appropriate steps on the enquiry notice dated 09.01.2026 issued by the 3rd respondent.
2. As the said order has not been complied with, the present contempt case has been filed.
3. Pending consideration of the contempt case, the respondent authorities have passed orders dated 20.06.2026.
4. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, the Contempt Case is closed. However, if at all the petitioner is aggrieved, she is at liberty to assail proceedings dated 20.06.2026 before the appropriate authority. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.09.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.2400 of 2026
02.09.2026 KBN