CMA/1145/2001 of P.Venugopala Reddy, Vs Sri M.S.Ramanathan, on 1 September 2026

APHC010176382001

IN THE

WEDNESDAY

THE HONOURA

THE HONOURABL

CIVIL MISCELLANE

Between:

1. P.Venugopala Reddy,, S

'X Block, Lotus Colony, Nan

1. Sri M S Ramanathan, S/

Sole Arbitrator, No. 163,

Karnataka State.

2. Union of India rep by its

Department of Space, Shar

Appeal Under Sectio

judgment of the Court below

file of the Principal Senior

No. 5 is concerned

IA NO: 1 OF 2001(CMP 18

Petition under Section

in the affidavit filed in suppo

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

LE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDE

EOUS APPEAL NOs: 1145 & 1165 OF 2

/o. Late Eswara Reddy, Contractor, R/o.

ndanam,

..

AND

/o. Late M.Subba Rao, Chief Engineer

11th Main, Saraswathipuram, Mysore

Construction Engineer, Civil Engineerin

r Centre, Sriharikota - 524 124, Nellore D

...Re

on_____against ordersset aside the d

w passed on 14.2.2000 in Os.No. 203/1

Civil Judge, Gudur, in so far as disallo

151 CPC praying that in the circumstan

ort of the petition, the High Court may be H

D

ELA

. Flat No. 4,

..Petitioner

(Retd,) and

- 570 009,

ng Division,

District.

spondents

decree and

993, on the

owing Claim

nces stated

e pleased to

condone the delay of 8 days in presenting CMA.No. /2000 against the decree and judgment passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur dated 14.2.2000 in O.S.No. 203/1993

IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 483 OF 2010

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased set aside the default order dated 23.10.2009 made in CMA No.1145/2001

restore the appeal, hear the same on merits IA NO: 2 OF 2010(CMAMP 8998 OF 2010

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: G ADI SESHA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: A RADHA KRISHNA

The Court made the following order:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

On 05.08.2026, there was no representation on either side.

Accordingly, the matter was posted to 19.08.2026 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.

2.

On 19.08.2026 also, there was no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity, it was posted to today under the same caption.

3.

Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that appellant is not interested to prosecute the case.

4.

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed.

____________________

BATTU DEVANAND, J

_______________________

TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J

Dated:02.9.2026

TJN/SZT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 1145 & 1165 OF 2001

Dated: 02.9.2026

TJN/SZT

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 1145 & 1165 OF 2001

PROCEEDING SHEET

SL.

NO.

DATE