WP/4141/2025 of SHAIK SIRAJ DOULA Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 1 September 2026

1. SHAIK SIRAJ DOULA 56 YEARS, MUSLI AYESHA NAGAR, KA

1. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY, HOME AMARAVATHI GUNTU

2. THE DIRECTOR GE PRADESH.

3. THE SUPERINTEND ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE STATION HOU KADAPA, YSR DISTR

5. RAMA KRISHNA, S/ INSPECTOR, I TOW PRADESH.

6. SHAIK JEELAN BASH 60 YEARS, MUSLIM NAGAR, KADAPA.

7. SHAIK GHOUSE BA ABOUT 53 YEARS, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) , THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT RI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNC T PETITION NO: 4141/2025 A, S/O. SHAIK HAROON SAHEB, AGE M, BUSINESS, R/O.DOOR.NO. 10 ADAPA. ...PE AND NDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS P E DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VEL UR DISTRICT NERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, DENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR D USE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE RICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. /O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER WN P.S, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT, HA, S/O. SHAIK HAROON SAHEB, AGE M, EMPLOYEE, DOOR NO. 10/70-17, ASHA, S/O. SHAIK HAROON SAHE MUSLIM, EMPLOYEE, DOOR NO.

CHEAM ED ABOUT 0/276-15-6, TITIONER PRINCIPAL LAGAPUDI ANDHRA DISTRICT, STATION, , CIRCLE ANDHRA ED ABOUT AYESHA EB, AGED 10/70-17,

MRK,J W.P.No.4141 of 2025

AYESHA NAGAR, KADAPA.

8. SHAIK MUNEER, S/O. SHAIK HAROON SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, MUSLIM, GOLDSMITH, DOOR NO. 10/70-17, AYESHA NAGAR, KADAPA.

9. SHAIK GAYAZ BASHA, S/O. SHAIK HAROON SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, MUSLIM, COMPUTER OPERATOR, DOOR NO. 11/156, KUMMARKUNTA STREET, KADAPA

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the actions of the Respondent-Police in interfering with the purely civil disputes and threatening the petitioner at the instance of the Unofficial Respondent/s illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and also contrary to the provisions of BNSS, 2023 apart from grave violation of the fundamental rights enshrined under Art.14, 19(1 )(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently, direct the Respondent- Police, not to interfere with the 'Civil Disputes' between the petitioner and the unofficial Respondent/s and to provide necessary protection to the petitioner AND/OR pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent-Police, more particularly Respondent.No.4 & No.5 not to call-upon the Petitioner to the I Town PS, Kadapa & interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial Respondents and to restrain them from intimidating or coercing the petitioner into any settlement, AND/OR pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. DHEERA KANISHKA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

MRK,J W.P.No.4141 of 2025

The Court made the following Order:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent events, no cause survives in this Writ Petition and the present Writ Petition became infructuous.

2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J

Dated: 02.09.2026 MDP